Thursday, August 23, 2007
Calculated vs Central Self, part 2.
"The Art of Possibility says that there are two versions of a person called the central self and the calculated self. Everyone seems to assume that the central self is obvious to us, which is probably a discussion for another post. But the interesting theory in The Art of Possibility is that the calculated self is created as a result of childhood survival strategies. My understanding of the theory is that each child survives by figuring out how to get what they need to feel safe. These strategies are the foundation of personality and, particularly, for stress response behaviors. If you take a look at those last 2 sentences, they implications are fairly astounding."
Last week, I looked at this in terms of work culture and environment where many people join to create a whole, but that is only one area of application. If this theory is correct, then it should play out for the individual as well. And that is where I'm struggling with the concept. If, as the theory states, our personalities are formed by the survival strategies that we developed in childhood, then how do we ever learn to be adults?
Let's assume that, for me personally, my childhood survival strategy was to smooth things out as much as possible. I created a safe place for myself by ensuring that there were no bumps in the road to create stress for anyone else. Then a career as a professional optimizer would make sense for me. But how did I learn to change the "child fixer" behavior to "adult fixer"? Is it just a matter of learning new skills in line with a personality that was created many years ago?
And what does it mean if I decide that I'm really a designer and not a fixer/optimizer. Does that mean that the personality I developed as a child is being overwritten? Is it possible to develop a new version of personality based on adult understandings? Or is this an example of finding some element of my "central self"?
As you can see, I have more questions than answers. As always, I rather like this phase of the process. I have some more moodling to do on the subject before I get any useful output, I suspect. And, of course, this is all seen from my point of view (5'4 - a little taller in heels). Other perspectives (oh, ADAW) are welcome!
Monday, August 20, 2007
We interrupt your regularly scheduled blog...
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
Seeing the forest
He goes on to show that this also works for emotional information - like how we feel about our lives or futures. He quotes a study where people were asked to think about how satisified they were with their lives. The results turned out to be depent on how nice the weather was in their city that day! In other words, even when imagining just general life happiness, the Reality First principal overlaid most people's entire lives with that day's weather.
On some level, I think that most of us are aware of this. But you can see how well that works in the picture of the cello above. Though I could clearly see the shine of the cello in low light through the tree fronds, the camera didn't really get it. In the same way, I often forget that no matter how clearly I believe my vision to be, the factors that are not my focus can still impact the clarity of my picture.
As always, I see an analogy in all of this. There are a number of factors, in my 9-5 (as if!) life, that are darkening my perspective on a job that I, for the most part, enjoy. I am slowly eliminating them in my "one piece at at time" way, so that I can lighten up my perspective.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Looking at the mullygrubs
When I'm tired, stressed, overextended or (my personal favorite) all three, I forget that this point of view is very useful. My perspective gets colored by negative emotions or I start to focus on the darker parts of the picture. In the shadows, life can get fairly confusing for me. I tend to lose my center. Fortunately, something always triggers my pattern weaving brain and then the light comes on again. In this case, very literally.
As I was taking pictures it occurred to me, once again, that life really is a matter of perspective and focus. In the top picture, the mullygrubs fill the screen and almost completely block out the light. It is hard to even see the flowers. In this one just above, the focus is on the long shadow. The plant and the flowers are secondary. As I'm sure you will not be surprised to hear, I have been looking at my work life in this way for most of the last month.
I can't be sure how this plant will fare in the coming weeks. Some of its health will be impacted by where it came from and how well it traveled before it came into my kitchen. I may not remember to water it properly. I may work my way around to the dark side again (yes, AD, you can add a Star Wars comment here) before I realize what I've done. Posting this is, in part, a way to remind myself of those things.
But, thanks to HTH and a few little flowers, I'm working on my perspective again. He was certainly right about one thing: if I have to have mullygrubs, the best ones to have are the kind that are pretty enough to get me right out of them!
Monday, March 5, 2007
Different Light
The light from each of them is very different. I put a daylight bulb in my closet, a bright white bulb in the hall, and two soft white bulbs in the bedroom fixture. I was struck by how much this changed my perspective. I didn’t recognize the clothes in my closet anymore. I kept turning on the light just to look at things.
Arizona Sunshine and 60 watt Daylight CFL
100 W Bright White CFL and 2 60 W Soft White CFLs
I thoroughly enjoy moments like this - the random entry of a means that, literally or figuratively, cast my regular environment in a different light. It jolts me out of my routine just enough that I can’t quite form a rut. AD refers to this as my childlike sense of wonder. I think I just need small bits of everyday delight to get me through the week. This time, it just took changing a few light bulbs!